Some sample, simple arguments from the
past that we’ve made some progress on:
1.
“Slavery is not
wrong. After all, slave owners benefit from slavery.”
2.
“Women shouldn’t
be able to go to school since they are so emotional.”
3.
“It’s not wrong
to eat animals because they are not rational.”
Tools:
What do you mean? –
ambiguity/lack
of clarity with a word
AND/OR
imprecision about quantity (some? All?)
Making
arguments logically valid.
Counterexamples
4.
“Slave owners
benefit from slavery.”
5.
If someone
benefits from an action, then that action is not wrong. F
6.
Therefore, slavery
is not wrong.
7.
(All?) Women are so emotional (?). F
8.
If some activity
is difficult for someone, then they shouldn’t have the chance to try it. ? F?
9.
“Women shouldn’t be able to go to school
10. (All?) Animals are not rational.”
11. If a being is not rational, then it’s not wrong to eat
it. F
= All non rational beings are OK to eat.
12. “It’s not wrong
to eat animals.
No comments:
Post a Comment